Risk-First Approach to Algorithmic Trading

Why Risk Management Comes First

In algorithmic trading, the difference between success and catastrophic failure often comes down to one thing: risk management. You can have the best predictive models in the world, but without proper risk controls, a single bad streak can wipe out months of gains.

The Kelly Criterion: Mathematical Position Sizing

At the heart of our risk management system is the Kelly Criterion, a mathematical formula that determines optimal position sizing:

f* = (p × b - q) / b

Where:

• p = probability of winning (win rate)
• q = probability of losing (1 - p)
• b = ratio of win to loss (usually 1 for symmetric payoffs)

Practical Example

Let's say we have:

• $10,000 account
• 55% win rate (p = 0.55)
• 70% signal confidence
• 2% market volatility

Full Kelly suggests 10% of capital - but this is considered aggressive.

We use Fractional Kelly (0.25), which gives us:

• Base size: 2.5% of capital = $250
• Volatility adjustment: ×1.5 (moderate volatility)
• Confidence scaling: ×0.7 (70% confidence)
• Final position: $262.50 (2.625% of account)

This conservative approach:

• Reduces returns by 10-15%
• But significantly improves risk-adjusted metrics
• Maintains max drawdown under 15% in stress tests

Multi-Layer Risk Controls

1. Dynamic Leverage Adjustment

Our system adjusts leverage based on:

• Market Regime: Lower leverage in high volatility periods
• Drawdown State: Reduced leverage when underwater
• Correlation: Lower leverage when positions are highly correlated

Maximum leverage limits:

• Crypto: 3x maximum
• Stocks: 2x maximum
• Options: Based on Greeks exposure

2. Value-at-Risk (VaR) Monitoring

We calculate VaR at 95% and 99% confidence levels daily:

python
def calculate_var(returns, confidence=0.95):
    """Calculate historical VaR"""
    return np.percentile(returns, (1 - confidence) * 100)

If VaR exceeds acceptable thresholds:

• Alert triggers for manual review
• Automatic position reduction
• Strategy reallocation

3. Drawdown Throttling

When unrealized P&L drops below thresholds:

4. Circuit Breakers

The kill switch halts ALL trading when:

• Daily loss exceeds 5% of capital
• Unusual market conditions detected (flash crash, exchange outage)
• System health checks fail
• Execution quality degrades significantly

Transaction Cost Reality

One of the biggest risk factors traders ignore: transaction costs.

Our comprehensive cost modeling includes:

• Exchange Fees: 0.1-0.3% for crypto (maker/taker)
• Slippage: 0.05-0.2% based on order size vs volume
• Spread: Bid-ask spread costs
• Market Impact: Price impact for larger positions

Total costs typically range from 0.1-0.5% per round trip.

This might seem small, but for a strategy making 100 trades/month:

• Total costs: 10-50% of capital annually
• A 60% gross return becomes 45-50% net return

Portfolio-Level Risk Management

Beyond individual trades, we manage portfolio-level risks:

Concentration Limits

• Max 10-20% per asset
• Sector exposure limits
• Geographic diversification

Correlation Monitoring

We track correlation between:

• Different strategies
• Different assets
• Market factors (VIX, Bitcoin dominance, etc.)

High correlation = reduced diversification benefit

Greeks Management (Options)

For options strategies, we monitor:

• Delta: Directional exposure
• Gamma: Delta sensitivity
• Vega: Volatility exposure
• Theta: Time decay

The Cost of Safety

Our risk-first approach has trade-offs:

Advantages:

• Consistent returns with lower volatility
• Survivability through market crashes
• Sleep-at-night peace of mind
• Regulatory compliance ready

Disadvantages:

• Lower maximum returns vs aggressive strategies
• Miss some explosive opportunities
• More complex system architecture
• Higher computational overhead

Real-World Performance Impact

Comparing aggressive vs conservative risk management:

The conservative approach wins over multi-year periods because staying in the game matters more than maximizing short-term gains.

Lessons Learned

After extensive testing and live trading:

1. Position sizing matters more than entry timing
2. Drawdowns are inevitable - plan for them
3. Transaction costs kill high-frequency strategies
4. Diversification is free lunch - take it
5. Risk management is not optional - it's foundational

Conclusion

In trading, you don't get rewarded for taking maximum risk. You get rewarded for taking optimal risk - the sweet spot where you maximize risk-adjusted returns while ensuring long-term survival.

Our risk-first approach may not be flashy, but it's built to last.

---

Want to see our risk management in action? Try our live demo or read about our system architecture.